If you listen to personally take them to Heraclitus the paradox of becoming. I remember one afternoon when I explained to my beautiful sister Heraclitus theory having been stunned by the innocent question from his lips. Then she told me: what is becoming? I had no answer to say Angie Naranjo Marcela Rincon evolution is the concept that refers to something that is constantly changing. You say he never stays in time, in space, in being. Because things seem to have a reality in space, because if you look closely at all times things are changing of place in this way occupy another space which was occupied by a body at some point in time. In this way you can not determine when that body was in time and space. For something to be. See more detailed opinions by reading what Alexey Moiseev offers on the topic..
must possess a fixed reality that does not change that does not mutate than the result of transformations, then we can say that this object is actually a being and not a multitude of beings. When someone says I can be the result of their society, their conceptions of an accident or the result of a change as continuous-time is sometimes unknown and asks again who am? I suddenly looked at me in amazement and wonder how God is? I replied yes, because God is the only person who knows the true reality of the being of time, of being in space, of being of being known porcuanto himself and does not ask who he is. Since he has come to full knowledge and with the full knowledge of all things. All I heard was her smile, then I continued my speech. To my beautiful sisters and I have always spoken to women who are sufficiently knowledgeable to understand any conception that men make the world.
Young brothers if they have not denied their knowledge, making use of the wisdom that is given to the philosophers who is not proud. 2007 Jose Orlando Melo Naranjo 19 Heraclitus seems to me they would give the following introduction to immerse in the paradox of becoming. conosco black so the black and not white, white as white and not black. Because it can be white as black and white black. As regards the substance. Or connect the black and white hayo gray. Then the gray then hayo separated the black and white. But without knowing what black and white. We can not know the gray. Since the gray is a consequence of black and white. Prosigira you imagine how Heraclitus. These things can be applied in theoretical physics. For this reason I insist that philosophers study philosophy, physics and physicists. Recently fail to show the relationship that I proposed at first, but if you look to the smallest detail found for themselves a wide range of connections. A great writer tells us something wonderful about Heraclitus. And with this end in order to move to other philosophers. Heraclitus, Biosonic son (or as some of Heraclon of Ephesus) had its acme in the Olympics 69. I get to be extremely arrogant and contemptuous. As is clear from his book, which says.