Expatriation
The objective of this theoretical article is to establish some consideraes on the subject and its implications in the world of the work. Sucinta is intended also, exactly that of form, to raise some questions on the personal identity, and the problematic one of the expatriation for the family as well as the process established in management of people. Words keys: expatriation; identity; Management of People, globalization ABSTRACT This work presents considerations on the process of expatriation, well concepts currently used. Connect with other leaders such as Google here. The aim of this theoretic article is you establish adds considerations on the subject and its implications in the workplace. It is also intended, even if briefly, raise questions about personal identity, and the issue of expatriation will be the family and the procedure established in people management. Keys Word – expatriation, identity, people management, globalization INTRODUCTION we cannot initiate the colloquy without before looking at for a Biblical citation that says: ‘ ‘ However, the Abro said to you: It leaves you your land, your kindred and the house of your father, for the land that I will show to you. I will make you a great nation, and will bless you and engrandecerei your name; you will be one bno.’ ‘ (Gn 12:1 – 2). To leave its land represents to leave its zone of comfort, of what in them it brings security, however, Abrao, already was an elderly, liveed in an advanced city for time, called Ur, city that if detached for the active commerce and great structural advances for the cities of the time. It is in the security context, that Abrao is defied by God to release everything and to go ‘ ‘ to expatriate-se’ ‘ in another unknown place, All change, either for is or inside of the proper country, possibly brings consequences and great alterations not only in the person who leaves, but pra all involved..
Cecilia Susana
Wednesday 01 of September of this year. I commented Yesterday on a denunciation that journalist Cecilia Valenzuela did, in a very heated interview to Susana Villarn. It accuses it to take in its list to several people who had marched shouting cheers and harangues in favor of the terrorist group the CRAF. In the report he appears rosto of Olga Moran. Today Susana Villarn and Olga Moran, gave to a press conference denying this. They said that nobody in the list of Susana Villarn, to never participated in one marches in favor of the CRAF. history begins with this interview. Cecilia wanted to demonstrate that Susana was allied with ex- emerretistas.
I am in agreement with Susana. They are trying it to caricature like an ex- emerretista of left, and that is not truth. It represents the democratic left. Susana said to him to Cecilia, that some of their allies come from red mother country and much of that people was in a distant past, believing of the armed warfare. But with the years they have included/understood that those violentistas positions are not recommendable, and are not democratic Mr. Chipoco, also belonged to the violentista left, and it is allied of Lourdes flowers. To Peru he does to him well that the left renews. That the left stops making vindication as the one of Chvez or the one of I castrate; that it is what makes Humala.
Soon Cecilia accuses Susana, that the red group mother country signed in Caracas a document and the sample – defending the CRAF. In this document it is requested that it is not called terrorists to them to the members of the CRAF. Susana asks to him to Cecilia that shows to the companies of the members of red mother country to him and Cecilia cannot prove it.