Espinosa makes a free examination of the Writing, opposing to affirm any thing to it that was not said to it with clarity. In this examination, it she understands that in the Writing, the reason is total free, being thus, each one will have the possibility to interpret the beddings of the faith of the skill that it will be more convenient and not to criticize the faith of they outrem, except if it possesss denegrecveis attitudes. Bayle supports two basic ideas in relation to the religions: The first one is that the fear constitutes the bedding of all the religion and second is that exists an irrigation ditch between the reason and the faith. The thinker supports its ideas through the argument of that he would be contradictory God to create everything who in the simply being idolatrado fence, it not it needs this, and if it needed, as well as it created everything, it could very insert the feeling of idolatria in us well, in the same scope of the vital necessities, this that, is wanting or not, the idolatria would be essence of the life. One thinks that the religion is as if it was a species of orienting compassing of the morality, however, if to agree to Bayle when it affirms that the fear constitutes the bedding of all religion, then, the religion does not have participation in the moral qualification of somebody, thus, it is indifferent to the sociability. 4? RELIGIOUS PLURALITY AND the CIVIL TOLERANCE As the reason is free and can interpret the Writing as we desire, then, confides the doors for a religious plurality, however, this plurality is seen of negative form because it will go for discords between the people and the State, thus, injuring the social peace and practising vindication to the religious uniformity. Bayle contests such idea. It affirms that the religious uniformity, beyond unnecessary, is dangerous.