Change is something that frightens a part of his person, to a part of what you are. That part is which prevents you to accomplish what you want, even if that is something you want. What is that part of you that is opposed to what you want? Why that part of you is opposed to what you want? You can change this opposition in cooperation? We reply to those questions. What is that part of you that is opposed to what you want? That party that opposes what you want is the subconscious mind, your personal universal mind. But keep in mind that this mind is not that you oppose everything what you want. No, that is not the case.
Your subconscious mind is opposed only to what’s new. Why that part of you is opposed to what you want? Why is it opposed to what’s new? This occurs because construct reality is work of the subconscious mind. And to construct reality your subconscious mind needs planes, need resources, need information. If you do not provide those planes, such information, then your subconscious mind does not You can build this new reality. The subconscious mind is not actually opposed to what you want. The only thing is that your subconscious mind cannot create what you want, because you not this providing the necessary so that your subconscious mind work and build the reality you want. Then this opposition represents only the paucity of information, which you, by neglect, disdain or laziness has not provided.
The opposition is only a reflection of their lack of interest in improving your life. You can change this opposition in cooperation? Very well, you know that what is opposed to their desires, their wishes for new things (includes new things everything new that you want, whether they are things like houses, cars, new relationships, beauty, etc.) is your subconscious mind. You know that this opposition is actually a demonstration of lack of information. Now know you how to convert such opposition in cooperation. Brother-in-law you become that opposition cooperation everything you want will come easily to your life, because what now stops it, the only thing that stops him, will be what impulse to what you want. If you want wealth, if you want success, if you want to improve their relationships, if you want to transform your intelligence, if you want to become strong and powerful magnetic then you only you will need to provide the relevant information through the necessary practices and that will quickly come into your life. In the book the secret of the power of the goals, Andrew Corentt presents all relevant information so that you understand how the mind creates reality. And it also presents powerful techniques such as the creation of a special dictionary, the construction of goals, the internalization of the information about what you want, etc. If really you want to become a person of success, a millionaire and happy person, the secret of the power of the goals will provide you all the necessary tools so that you become what you want to. Remember that if something stops, if something prevents you to search more information about this book, is just your subconscious mind that is It was opposed to its wealth, success and happiness. Original author and source of the article.
Other movies like Matrix, characters living within virtual reality generated by a computer, and Dark City, where inhabit a huge mock in the form of city which is, ultimately, the perverse dream of an alien race. Scenario unrealistic naif from the Truman Show presented at the search for reality, in the end all the protagonists seek a reality that has been artificially made to control them. and you need to find the truth behind the illusory reality and as they say the critics: his discovery is equivalent or leads to an act of rebellion, of contempt for the established order, The Matrix has in common with the Show the notion that, in a sense, the simulation is more real than reality itself. There are who finds similarities in the situation that describes the film with the well-known thesis about Hyperreality exposed by Jean Baudrillard and other scholars of the culture from the end of the 1970s. The Hyperreality appears in a culture When weakens the opposition that separates the real from the imaginary, the simulation of the original. The real and the imaginary do not exist but Baudrillard – type at a certain distance. What happens when such distance, even that separates the real from the imaginary, start to disappear and be absorbed by the model only? The answer is that we enter a world ruled by the beginning of the simulation, where real and model have exchanged their positions, and where the reality is which is subject to the model. An illustration of this phenomenon is Baudrillard in the work of Philip K.
Dick, where the universe described is not possible or impossible, is not real or unreal. It is hyperreal. It is a universe of simulation, which is something entirely different. They have some theorists have challenged the theories of Baudrillard, not the fact that a part of the world is moving into an era of drills, but the assertion that has been effectively cleared the border between reality and simulation of film criticism.
On the one hand creates a sort of million not welcome people who must be taken out of the societies in which they live and where they have relationships and family and can be massively imprisoned or deported. For normal Europeans that new hunting of witches is something that will promote intolerance, racism and xenophobia, which will weaken their citizens freedoms system, which will give more recruits to Al Qaeda and that will cost them a fortune to implement new detention or concentration of irregular fields. Also affect several poor countries who will be deprived of important remittances sent them their citizens working in the EU and it will force to have to receive tens or hundreds of thousands of returnees by altering the labour market. All this will destabilize democracies such as Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia and other Nations that have at least half a million of his compatriots in Europe. The European Union itself shows its contradictions. It fought for decades to make crumble Soviet authoritarianism to showing the advantages of a parliamentary democracy. However, this account today with 7 heads of State that have never been elected by anybody (monarchs).
On the other hand, the relative Socialist egalitarianism in the East end has led to be crumbling to the system of social benefits in the West and to grow the social polarization between rich and poor Europeans. The EU has also striven to liberalize to Latin America and the third world, but at the same time calling to the markets of poor countries are open to their products and capital rejected the mobility of people and the free movement (without which there can be give, in fact, a true free trade). At the same time the EU calls to expand recruiting new former socialist countries the hardest are being immigrants from the third world because while opens the labor market to citizens of the new countries partners who newly arrive, seeks to debug the Latino, African and oriental immigrants who have been working years or five-year periods in the EU. A truly democratic Union should be one in which all their heads of State and parliaments are elected, in that all those who live in it (aside from the place where you were born) have rights to vote and to be resident and in which all of its instances are popularly elected. The EU, however, has a very special democracy.
If previously not recognized the right to vote and residence to millions of undocumented workers now you want to detain them or deport them in mass. He managed to bring down the Communist dictatorships, but instead of extending its own democracy and reduce its social inequality, still heads of Been appointed for life and inelectos and increases the gap between those who have much and those who have nothing. It requests more powers to its continental Parliament to the pair that denies the right to their Nations to decide democratically if they want to or not a new Treaty and ask the only country who dared to vote to review its position or despised. Original author and source of the article.